Home   |   Companies   |   Browse News   |   Subscribe   |   IIA   |   ACI   |   RMIA   |   Events   |   Awards  
Search Site


RM Directory
Anti Money Laundering
Associations
Brokers
Business Continuity
Compliance & Legal
Compliance & Risk Software
Education & Training
ERM
Insurance companies and services
IT Security & Fraud
OH&S
Recruitment
Regulators
Risk Advisory
Security
 
 
 
 
 
Industry Links
LexisNexis
Human Resources
Lawyers Weekly
 
  NewsSeptember 3, 2010
20 steps to better corporate governance

 
The Corporate Secretaries International Association recently released a research report recommending 20 practical steps for Boards to improve their companies’ corporate governance

Corporate governance is undergoing much questioning given the serious governance failings that contributed to and sustained the global financial crisis. As such, the Corporate Secretaries International Association, an international organisation whose members comprise national bodies of professionals at the frontline of governance, including Chartered Secretaries Australia, recently commissioned and released a report providing Board Directors with 20 practical steps for improving their companies’ governance.

“One of the biggest lessons to come out of the global financial crisis is that education and a zero tolerance of wrongdoing at Board level is far more effective than regulation in curbing corporate misconduct,” said Chartered Secretaries Australia chief executive Tim Sheehy.

The report, written by Professor Bob Tricker, a world- renowned corporate governance expert with professorships at three universities, listed the 20 practical steps for improving corporate governance as:



1. Recognise that good corporate governance is about the effectiveness of the governing body – not about compliance with codes

2. Confirm the leadership role of the Board chairman

3. Check that non-executive directors have the necessary skills, experience, and courage

4. Consider the calibre of the non-executive directors

5. Review the role and contribution of non-executive directors

6. Ensure that all directors have a sound understanding of the company

7. Confirm that the Board’s relationship with executive management is sound

8. Check that directors can access all the information they need

9. Consider whether the Board is responsible for formulating strategy

10. Recognise that the governance of risk is a Board responsibility

11. Monitor Board performance and pursue opportunities for improvement

12. Review relations with shareholders — particularly institutional investors

13. Emphasise that the company does not belong to the directors

14. Ensure that directors’ remuneration packages are justifiable and justified

15. Review relations between external auditors and the company

16. Consider relations with the corporate regulators

17. Develop written Board-level policies covering relations between the company and the societies it affects

18. Review the company’s attitudes to ethical behaviour

19. Ensure that company secretary’s function is providing value

20. Consider how corporate secretary’s function might be developed

“Developments in corporate governance thinking and practice have often been responses to company collapses, corporate corruption or the domination of companies by an individual,” said Tricker, who cited previous research from the Harvard Business School which found that recent Boardroom failures differed from the previous corporate failings.

Enron, WorldCom, and other corporate collapses were rooted in management malfeasance and fraud, leading to the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Tricker said in the report, however, he noted the Harvard researchers found that recent corporate governance problems were primarily attributable to the growing complexity of the companies that Boards governed.

“The steps that companies and their Boards could take towards better corporate governance included recognising that good corporate governance is about the effectiveness of the governing body – not about compliance with codes,” Tricker said.

This process involves reviewing Board processes, including the Chairman’s leadership role, the balance and style of the Board, the caliber and contribution of outside Directors; monitoring the Board’s performance; and improving Directors’ knowledge of the business and ensuring they have the information they want, he said.

“Other steps involved ensuring that directors’ remuneration packages are justifiable and justified; reviewing relations between the company and shareholders, particularly institutional investors, and with auditors, regulators, and other stakeholders; and, ensuring that the company secretarial function is providing value.”

22 April 2010

Send this article to colleague/friend

 

Home |  News Archive |  Advertising |  About Us |  Contact Us |  Privacy Policy

Copyright © Reed Business Information. All material on this site is subject to copyright. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be reproduced, translated, transmitted, framed or stored in a retrieval system for public or private use without the written permission of the publisher.

eNewsletter
 
enter email to register/unregister
2010
Media Kit